|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 9, 2014 10:55:59 GMT -5
I forgot I have a old true detective magazine with a article "Lindbergh case secrets from gov hoffmans private files" by alan hynd. one of hoffmans investigators said hochmuth couldn't see elephant tracks in the snow.
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 8, 2014 17:57:43 GMT -5
I think hochmuth saw Hauptman in fact he saw him twice.
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 8, 2014 16:17:30 GMT -5
i think he saw Hauptman like others did. his eyes wernt bad as people think at the time of the sighting. reilly-why do you wear glasses?hochmuth- at a distance yes, for reading I read without glasses. he had better eyes then I do, I have to wear distance and reading. I could've saw that jerk from my porch
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 8, 2014 9:09:40 GMT -5
well he was a witness and he told a trooper in 1935 that he was the man in the car. the ladder was puit into evidence and it was damaging. it was a task for wilentz but I think he expected it. everything was damaging to Hauptman because all the evidence points to him
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 7, 2014 10:21:19 GMT -5
his eyesight wasn't totally bad. did reilly question it?
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 6, 2014 12:52:04 GMT -5
wilentz wasn't stupid enough to put a blind man on the stand. he wasn't blind at the time of the Hauptman sighting. maybe four years later his eyes might have been worse. also hoffmans reinvestigation I think didn't turn up anything concrete, because why kidnap wendel if Hoffman discovered all this stuff?
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 6, 2014 2:24:18 GMT -5
they couldn't have found to much, they kidnapped paul wendel and tried to pin it on him
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 6, 2014 2:22:37 GMT -5
fair enough, im sorry for the outburst. I won the football pool and had a few beers
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 5, 2014 20:04:33 GMT -5
not bizarre ann didn't know nothing. don't throw this stuff out its crazy
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 4, 2014 17:31:26 GMT -5
your right mike green was misremembering the facts decades later. how many times through the years a oldtimer makes claims especially journalists, that they had all these exclusives and you find out they didn't. im sure you came across these examples
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 4, 2014 9:27:17 GMT -5
einstein is a new one, even he isn't safe
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 3, 2014 22:53:00 GMT -5
I met noel behn, I had questions about his book. I was interested at that time about his new York city sources which I wanted to see but he died the next year or a year after that
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 3, 2014 15:22:32 GMT -5
I really cant go by what harry green said decades later. you cant prove it one way or another and some of the claims are stupid
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 2, 2014 19:26:15 GMT -5
oh I read it wrong, sorry. she did have a sad end of life the Washington post which I think her husband owned went up for auction. her son who was just a kid got killed by a automobile. this book is very good
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 2, 2014 14:48:22 GMT -5
queen of diamonds is a lot of money? your sure?
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 2, 2014 14:46:50 GMT -5
then who was in the woods? do you know how many Lindbergh baby claims there are? one of the famous ones use to come on the Bronx Lindbergh tour years ago. I don't know what story I don't know
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 2, 2014 14:08:11 GMT -5
I have the book "queen of diamonds the bio of evalyn walsh mclean. she bought the hope diamond in 1911 for 180,000 dollars when she was 24 years old. ahe spent 200,000 dollars on a honeymoon in paris, and ended up with insufficient funds at a paris hotel to pay the bill. she wandered the gloomy rooms of her home imagining crawling reptiles while overcoming her morphine addiction.
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 2, 2014 13:58:59 GMT -5
come on amiee hes not the baby
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 1, 2014 18:19:43 GMT -5
I suspect Hoffman had nothing, because he would have used it because of the bad raps he was getting in the papers and otherwise, and liz morrow wasn't psychotic theres no evidence at all that she did anything
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 31, 2014 8:34:05 GMT -5
after the father, and the nursemaid identified the child and the undergarment with the blue thread that was matched with the spool, im totally convinced it was the Lindbergh baby
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 30, 2014 18:33:04 GMT -5
sorry amie I will have to respectfully disagree about your dad being the Lindbergh baby
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 29, 2014 21:36:34 GMT -5
I don't really base my research on anybodys book
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 28, 2014 15:07:25 GMT -5
I went on the historical tour a few years ago. went to the site of the restraunt called the balt, where a lot of people involved in the investigation of the Lindbergh kidnapping went.
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 28, 2014 12:07:50 GMT -5
really allen?
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 27, 2014 16:56:56 GMT -5
don't understand your point. didn't Einstein live in Princeton? what so strange about it?
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 27, 2014 9:45:10 GMT -5
I have the document of the police file on hauptmans friends I think hes on it. they must have talked to him
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 25, 2014 12:21:47 GMT -5
theres a few I will have to dig them up.
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 22, 2014 22:47:27 GMT -5
its not debatable. you have to read wood experts that studied the wood evidnce in the past 15 years
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 22, 2014 22:45:36 GMT -5
betty lived a long life. I don't think she ever came back here. I think she died in 1996 I could be wrong mike can verify that.
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 22, 2014 12:15:11 GMT -5
thanks
|
|