|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 22, 2014 10:12:57 GMT -5
I thought condons number was unlisted?
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 22, 2014 10:12:00 GMT -5
how about boat as boad? to many excuses for hauptman
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 21, 2014 19:53:06 GMT -5
after he got the money he might have forgot about it
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 20, 2014 16:14:54 GMT -5
I cant tell with black and white pictures how expensive gows clothes were, the jury looked like they bought there clothes on a street
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 20, 2014 15:05:41 GMT -5
are you saying they gave her the furs for false testimony?
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 20, 2014 8:11:04 GMT -5
the handwriting was overwhelming. the problem is through the years non experts gave there expert opinions and proved nothing. leave it to the experts
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 19, 2014 18:12:17 GMT -5
when somebody admits doing something its not unknown. I don't believe one person wrote one thing and somebody wrote the other. and I don't believe Cassidy wrote it. staying on this, I also don't believe the wood was faked in the attic or otherwise, I don't believe the baby was handed out the front door or the ladder was a plant. I do believe it was the Lindbergh baby in the woods. if somebody shows me hard evidence otherwise I will seriously look at it.
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 18, 2014 20:14:38 GMT -5
I disagree, I think the ladder was used. mud in the room, they found the ladder markings on the house, ladder imprints on the ground. as far as the fingerprints on the ladder, it would have helped Hauptman if he didn't take a piece of wood from his attic and put it on the ladder.
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 18, 2014 13:30:11 GMT -5
amy, this is what happened. you can question anything in any case, why this why that. Hauptman shouldnt have did a lot of things that connected him to the case. I guess it was easier for him to conceal it somewhere like the babys closet. I was in that closet.
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 18, 2014 10:46:41 GMT -5
well its silly to think one person wrote one thing and another person writing the other. either he wrote it or not. I believe he did
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 18, 2014 8:12:59 GMT -5
mike I don't base it on Cassidy because he was a fraud, he testified in the parker trial also. I go by what came out of hauptmans mouth. ive stopped looking because there isn't much else
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 17, 2014 21:08:40 GMT -5
he wrote it amy
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 12, 2014 20:48:36 GMT -5
red Johnson was grilled in Hartford conn, then was cleared. the guy who grilled him ended up being the lead investigator in the famous Hartford circus fire in the 40s
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 11, 2014 20:50:50 GMT -5
hi sam, thanks to sue Campbell we have the program, and it looks like he wasn't going to speak
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 11, 2014 20:48:55 GMT -5
whos going to see it on major highways? we know lupica saw a ladder in a car in the back roads of hopewell
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 11, 2014 17:11:33 GMT -5
amy what made you determed that the ladder was already in Hopewell before march 1?
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 9, 2014 14:58:12 GMT -5
the tour was conducted by a researcher named Richard sloan we had many of them through the years. rich stopped a couple of years ago
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 8, 2014 22:37:05 GMT -5
I met bruckmans grandson at the lindy Bronx tour. he was a well respected officer. I don't think he wrote th
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 7, 2014 15:18:54 GMT -5
the only thing good in peoples collections is pictures you havnt seen. that's my experience in seeing collections
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 6, 2014 13:45:59 GMT -5
his lawyers ended up knowing nothing
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 6, 2014 10:37:47 GMT -5
he wrote it, he got caught in so many lies. this one came back to haunt him
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 4, 2014 18:42:38 GMT -5
your right, now I would by todays standards, I feel back then there was a lot of on the job training. they were hiring people from other countires, who knows what they really knew how to do
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 4, 2014 17:19:25 GMT -5
Duncan its 1932 rich people had nursemaids, ann Lindbergh was born into having everything done for her, she couldn't even take care of a sick child with a cold, she had to call betty gow to come to Hopewell to take care of Charlie jr. why would you think they should have hired a registered nurse, were they even around then?
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 4, 2014 13:51:22 GMT -5
Duncan, this case is so over analized it could make your head spin.
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 3, 2014 20:02:07 GMT -5
betty had nothing to do with the crime
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 3, 2014 6:08:02 GMT -5
theres nothing in the Hoffman papers that proves anything. its been looked at by many researchers 80s and 90s
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 2, 2014 20:59:31 GMT -5
there not outdated. the same crap was discussed then as it is now. ive heard it all. the computers don't mean nothing. ive debated on both levels. theres nothing like a live debate
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 2, 2014 20:43:16 GMT -5
but mike, in the eighties fisher at least debated his book with other authors with book debates. gardner to make his book legit has to di it. now I don't know why these things arnt set up anymore but its due because of the rash of books that came out. its not gardners fault or any other author but at least the public can make its own mind
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 2, 2014 19:21:13 GMT -5
fishers book is not a novel, because nobody ever proved that Hauptman was framed not even gardner whos book is a real novel
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Aug 1, 2014 22:20:25 GMT -5
i think amy, that they were picked before condon entered the picture
|
|