|
Post by romeo12 on Oct 4, 2014 20:49:54 GMT -5
stella I had many arguments with kennith kerwin on the Lindbergh kidnap tour years ago. I firmly believe it was the baby. its funny kennith signed a baseball for me I was planning on getting Harold olson on the ball but he didn't want to meet me, even though we got along very well, I liked him
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Oct 4, 2014 18:20:24 GMT -5
alan lane had a good enough backround to do these tests. if the Lindbergh babys didn't bother the Lindbergh family for dna and other nonsense, the stuff would have still been at the museum for todays testing
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Oct 4, 2014 11:35:22 GMT -5
everybody is trying to be doctors here, the fact is he had rickets so did 5000 other kids at that time. beyond that, I never in 20 years saw any proof that he had other diseases as far as I know. until somebody can take a peak at his medical records we don't really know
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 30, 2014 21:20:13 GMT -5
what I heard in the last 20 years, his medical records is housed at john Hopkins hospital in Baltimore. I don't know how true this is or not
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 28, 2014 18:24:27 GMT -5
if your referring to me lightening jew about useless posts when I read your nonsense I think the same thing
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 28, 2014 10:59:56 GMT -5
whats the difference if the baby was sick, this notion that the father killed him because of this reason is absurd. I never bought it and many researchers never did either.
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 27, 2014 18:10:29 GMT -5
I don't think reilly was aware of the secret between Mitchell and Swayze about who did the actual autopsy. im sure he would have brought it up at the trial
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 27, 2014 10:21:06 GMT -5
well. Harold olson a famous Lindbergh baby, had his fingerprints compared to the latent prints taken off the toys and they didn't match. I knew Harold we talked a lot he had a great sense of humor and I broke his chops many times
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 25, 2014 21:40:00 GMT -5
I know she was alone, ask anybody who studied the case a long time they think it was Charlie I will never believe it wasnt
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 25, 2014 13:35:41 GMT -5
so your saying that the father and betty gow and the shirt with the blue thread dosnt mean nothing?
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 25, 2014 9:28:14 GMT -5
not insane, mislead
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 24, 2014 21:19:02 GMT -5
don't agree amie, im satisfied that the baby was in fact Charles jr. theres to many Lindbergh babys I knew kennith kerwin and the other one who was famous forgot his name. they didn't play with a full deck
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 24, 2014 11:53:05 GMT -5
well I guess the Lindbergh family by law had the right to remove them, I think one of the Lindbergh babys compared there fingerprints to the babys prints and they didn't match. im going to have to check on that. when you have multi Lindbergh baby claims and the family is bothered with this nonsense I guess they had enough and looked into there options
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 23, 2014 21:07:07 GMT -5
matching the latent prints of the baby to these people that think there the Lindbergh baby was not enough. after bothering the family for dna,they pulled the items from the njsp museum. I don't blame them. im glad I got to see them before this happened
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 22, 2014 13:52:25 GMT -5
the big question is, does your fathers fingerprints match the prints taken from little Charles toys
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 21, 2014 8:29:46 GMT -5
I thought it was a open board, I gave my opinion lightning jew
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 20, 2014 20:41:50 GMT -5
don't buy it
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 20, 2014 8:05:54 GMT -5
good luck, we both agree its a crazy case.thats why I look at other cases in the meantime, like lizzie borden
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 19, 2014 19:38:49 GMT -5
I understand mike, you will be the first one to put the pieces together if you can, but I believe you wont
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 19, 2014 18:52:44 GMT -5
I don't think it solves the case in its entirely,i believe wendel was kidnapped and tortured and ellis parker looked like a fool along with his son and gov hoffman
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 19, 2014 17:07:50 GMT -5
mike I disagree, wendel was kidnapped and Hoffman wasn't directly involved but was briefed. I could never get any police reports in the city to make a judgement, I will stick to suicide
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 19, 2014 15:15:47 GMT -5
if Hoffman was on to something, why did they kidnap paul wendel? Hoffman didn't die in a hotel it was a apt owned or rented by the saints and sinners club he belong to. I took a picture of the building a few years ago. it is a mystery how he died, I don't think it was murder, but either suicide or heart attack. I could never get any documents to support either one
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 19, 2014 11:23:08 GMT -5
why would wilentz worry about a stupid nightshirt. the fact is it was fashioned to keep the baby warmer, and it was good evidence that the baby in the woods was charlie
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 18, 2014 18:25:37 GMT -5
so your saying beety knew the baby would be taken, I disagree
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 18, 2014 14:46:14 GMT -5
are you kidding amy? your questioning the nightshirt?
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 11, 2014 5:46:40 GMT -5
I don't buy it, however the witnesses wernt the only thing that doomed Hauptman his time on the stand the wood, and handwriting
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 10, 2014 19:31:53 GMT -5
aimee what story? enlighten me
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 9, 2014 19:27:49 GMT -5
its not convincing that kallok was involved. the author didn't convince me
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 9, 2014 19:10:31 GMT -5
I think I went to his lecture years ago in Hopewell about father kallok and he was in the process in writing the book. he didn't convince me that this guy was involved, jim fisher was right
|
|
|
Post by romeo12 on Sept 9, 2014 14:27:07 GMT -5
you don't know how his vision was in 1932. I think it was good enough to see a mans face in a car. I agree his vision wasn't great but doable
|
|