jack7
Major
Der Führer
Posts: 1,920
|
Post by jack7 on Mar 13, 2010 18:50:54 GMT -5
"We (Betty Gow and Anne) first believed it was some form of practical joke by Charles."
In spite of note on windowsill, open window and open shutter, and Charles had eaten, bathed, conversed with wife and "studied" in library.
|
|
jack7
Major
Der Führer
Posts: 1,920
|
Post by jack7 on Mar 14, 2010 8:00:59 GMT -5
"The light was off," Betty.
"The light was on," Anne.
"I turned the light on," Charles.
"I didn't see a note," Betty.
"I didn't see a note," Anne.
"The note was on the windowledge," Charles.
"I went into town for flashlights," Ollie. 24 hour Walmart?
"We always pin the blanket over him," Anne & Betty. Know what the results of a child swallowing a safety pin are?
"The shutter is warped so it can't be locked," Betty. So the impoverished Lindbergh family struggles on with their warped shutters. And if that's not an important thing why lock the other shutters. Why not have curtains? Do the Lindberghs think of themselves as peeker bait? "Look at us all of you - aren't we so cool!"
"Usually the French window is open at night," Anne. MAJOR PROBLEM SAYING THAT ANNE - WHY IS THE SE WINDOW OPEN 3/1? Why ever leave the window with the broken shutter unlocked and open?
"The child is not disturbed between 8 and 10 PM," Charles. And yet Anne repeadedly "disturbed" (simply looking in on Charlie) him. Why didn't she on the night of 3/1? Especially when a noise was heard by Charles, Charles at times was bathing or "studying," and would never have known. Why didn't Betty look in on her "little darling?"
It doesn't seem that a mother would leave her newborn son to fly off adventuring - was this really Betty's child?
|
|
jack7
Major
Der Führer
Posts: 1,920
|
Post by jack7 on Mar 14, 2010 18:57:15 GMT -5
"We (BI/FBI) will help in any way we can," J.E. Hoover.
The division went on, however, to clandestinely investigate the crime without the knowledge of NJSP or NYPD. Example: stationing agents across the street from Condon's house.
If Hoover discovered Noso did it would he even implicate that important spy? Would he claim that he had nothing to do with the investigation (which he did claim)?
Would Hoover regret an evening or two with Noso, whom, he (in spite of Noso's evilness) never said anything bad about officially?
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Mar 16, 2010 16:07:50 GMT -5
Jack,
The man "outted" himself. Also, I believe Hoover would have said he was involved if he believed he was. Noso had exhausted his value to the FBI a long time priorthereto.
|
|
jack7
Major
Der Führer
Posts: 1,920
|
Post by jack7 on Mar 16, 2010 22:52:58 GMT -5
Michael:
Trying to open doors here, not close windows (oops - sorry Betty G).
Facts are that Hoover admitted he knew Noso "socially." So J. Edgar Hoover, head of U.S. Intelligence just happens to know one of those genuinely implicated in the Lindbergh crime? Who cares that "Noso had exausted his value to the FBI a long time priorthereto."? Noso? FBI (certainly they would still care about him.)?
Is this issue being avoided because Noso was a homosexual (bi)?
So now there's a new payback motive and it is even being disregarded by this supposedly nondescriminatedly site.
And it's not by a minor figure - Noso and Fisch are solidly connected and of course Fisch and BRH - how much more do you want on your plate?
|
|
jack7
Major
Der Führer
Posts: 1,920
|
Post by jack7 on Mar 16, 2010 23:30:19 GMT -5
As I, and a few others (very few) have said over many years, this crime hasn't been solved because the correct motive hasn't been determined. IOW, the actual facts are there to determine what happened, but the why is very gone.
In just, the crime was too horrible to be - but it did happen. Now looking at the whole thing in a different way is certainly necessary if one wants to figure the thing out.
It's up to each investigator - do you want to find out or continue with what supposedly happened?
|
|