|
Post by Michael on Feb 8, 2020 11:06:35 GMT -5
One of the main things those who hold the "Lone-Wolf" position do is explain away the Look-outs at both Woodlawn and St. Raymond's cemeteries. I believe I've ruined that idea with all that I have presented in V2. In V3, I gave even more proof about this which I hope everyone noticed. This comes on page 107 when they brought in Lindbergh to view a motion picture film of Cerardi walking and running to see if he could identify him. Why this is important? It proves that both Police, as well as Lindbergh, held the position the lookout existed and was definitely a Confederate. Here it is almost 1933 and they are taking film footage of this guy specifically to show Lindbergh. Next, the other thing that's important is what they did NOT ask him to do. See what I am saying? They aren't asking him to "listen" to Cerardi say " Hey Doc." ibb.co/rkFbrHV
|
|
|
Post by trojanusc on Feb 8, 2020 20:55:33 GMT -5
Isn't the lookout's handkerchief still in the collection? Don't know how you can know that exists and still believe in the "lone wolf."
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Feb 9, 2020 11:00:24 GMT -5
Isn't the lookout's handkerchief still in the collection? Don't know how you can know that exists and still believe in the "lone wolf." The Look-out threw down a handkerchief and police returned to retrieve it. From there an investigation into it ensued. Like the burlap bag they attempted to trace it as well as what's listed on the report below: ibb.co/1vN3yKdA long time ago Mark showed me a handkerchief that was associated with this investigation. I carried around the assumption that it was the one they found and picked up. However, Mark let me know that he believed it was most likely one obtained from the manufacturer during the investigation. Over the years I've seen it suggested that the Look-outs at both Cemeteries were merely innocent passers by. I've also seen it suggested that the Look-outs actually were CJ since neither were seen at the same time. I think I've ruined these arguments in V2, but I am open to any thoughts to the contrary. Lastly, its worth mentioning Richard Cahill's suggestion that the Look-out, at least at St. Raymond's, was actually Captain Oliver. It's outside the box and interesting, however, I believe I've neutralized that idea as well. To add to this I would find it hard to believe Oliver, after such time, would allow police - to include his very own force - to continue to waste resources investigating someone that was actually HIM. Again, I am all ears for any counter-arguments.
|
|