|
Post by hunley2 on Dec 22, 2010 7:23:56 GMT -5
I don't know if anyone has posted this theory or not, if they have I have overlooked it. I find myself wondering, when Lindbergh came home unexpectedly March 1, 1932, missing his scheduled appearance, maybe someone slipped in with him. There could have been someone hiding in the car, with his knowledge. He just let too many things get swept under the rug to be as intelligent as he is; what about Breck, his good friend? I think he also has the intelligence to work with him on a scheme such as this. Does anyone else think Breck would have helped with the actual disappearance of Jr. or help cover it up after it happened?
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Dec 22, 2010 8:35:40 GMT -5
I am not a fan of any involvement concerning Breck. But having said that I do believe its important to note he was not only an Attorney he was Lindbergh's Attorney & personal friend. So he was attempting to assist the family by his close involvement. Both assist and protect.
But his very own Step-Daughter had just been there baby sitting the child. I don't believe he has ANY knowledge prior that anything like this was about to happen.
I've always viewed Lindbergh coming home strange for several reasons. First, he thought he was supposed to be somewhere else but forgot. Gee, how many coincidences can we have in one night? Next, he's late even if he did forget. Another odd occurrence. Then he's blowing the horn to announce to everyone he's home. This pinpoints in everyone's head exactly where he is at the time.
With the horn blowing I don't think someone is with him. If they were at any time they got out before this happens.
But this is just my opinion. I certainly don't want to stifle the idea. We all won't agree on everything - and shouldn't.
|
|
|
Post by hunley2 on Dec 23, 2010 23:52:38 GMT -5
So, we know Breck may not have been a willing participant with forewarning, but I definitely think he knew America was in dire need of a hero. The hero was a close, personal friend. Breck, (with his background) had the mental intellect and experience to help pull something like this off. I do not think he had a problem saving a hero and personal friend who also happened to be his client ( loyalty and his own reputation). Was the horn blowing upon arrival a routine thing? If not, I definitely feel it was for the same reasons Michael listed above.
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Dec 24, 2010 8:53:41 GMT -5
I don't want to be a thread "hog" so I'll try to keep this to a minimum.....
I have searched for an answer to this question for years and I don't recall finding anything to answer it. I would like to re-visit the Trial Transcripts again because something is telling me to.
Having said that in 10+ years not finding something doesn't mean there isn't an answer. A perfect example is someone, Rab I believe, challenged me once concerning the Geo Wash Bridge, Tunnel, and Ferries being check-pointed by the Police outside of one of the books. I believe I found something in '04. I read at least an hours worth of material on this Case a night usually with a goal in mind, however, it never works out that way because I will find something out about a different topic which then leads me to find out more about that instead. It's just how it works. In fact, just last night I found another source to answer Rab's challenge - completely by accident - that I had never before laid eyes on.
That only took me 10 years to find.
Considering that Sam Bornstein is probably the only person to read more then me on this Case, its an indication how long it takes to satisfy certain points and/or answer specific questions.
I've always harped on the visiting the Archives and a wealth of information that will bring. But also there are many facts the Police never visited, or possibly, did not record. This stuff can be found in the Hoffman Collection or in other places outside of the Archives.
It just takes a very long time to find them all, evaluate the sources, then try to explain the conflicts they present in the face of the other facts that exist which contradict them.
|
|
|
Post by terryfizz on Dec 29, 2010 14:42:20 GMT -5
Charles Lindbergh was a perfectionist. His son had "difficulties". CL killed his son and faked the whole kidnapping. This was relayed by a senior FBI agent working the case. The government could not let a national hero be implicated in such a hedious crime and therefore chose to cover it up.
|
|
|
Post by hunley2 on Dec 29, 2010 22:39:18 GMT -5
terryfizz wrote, "Charles Lindbergh was a perfectionis". and, "This was relayed by a senior FBI agent working the case." It is odd a perfectionist would miss a speaking engagement. What senior FBI agent are you referring to?
|
|