luf12
Trooper II
Posts: 70
|
Post by luf12 on Jul 5, 2019 12:06:50 GMT -5
Where can I find hard evidence of John Condon's guilt of help kidnapping the baby?
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Jul 5, 2019 12:18:41 GMT -5
Where can I find hard evidence of John Condon's guilt of help kidnapping the baby? Speaking for myself only: There is none. He was brought in after the fact to assist with the extortion.
|
|
luf12
Trooper II
Posts: 70
|
Post by luf12 on Jul 5, 2019 12:23:08 GMT -5
Where can I find hard evidence of John Condon's guilt of help kidnapping the baby? Speaking for myself only: There is none. He was brought in after the fact to assist with the extortion. Since there is none, John Condon's holes in his stories is hard evidence that Condon was ally of the kidnapper.
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Jul 5, 2019 12:43:41 GMT -5
Since there is none, John Condon's holes in his stories is hard evidence that Condon was ally of the kidnapper. Well its my position that there is none. Others might disagree or hold some other kind of position. It is clear to me that Condon was specifically brought in to help facilitate the collection of the ransom while keeping the Extortionists insulated and safe. I don't know how anyone could read the FACTS in V2 and come away with a different conclusion UNLESS they excuse what he did by saying he was in fear for his life or was being blackmailed into his role. He certainly knew quite a bit more than what he was lying to police about. One could argue he knew nothing about the kidnapping but I personally believe at some point before the ransom was paid that he knew the child was dead. But when it comes to him being guilty of assisting the criminals with the extortion there is no question whatsoever and I am convinced that extra 20K was originally meant for him.
|
|
luf12
Trooper II
Posts: 70
|
Post by luf12 on Jul 5, 2019 12:52:42 GMT -5
Since there is none, John Condon's holes in his stories is hard evidence that Condon was ally of the kidnapper. Well its my position that there is none. Others might disagree or hold some other kind of position. It is clear to me that Condon was specifically brought in to help facilitate the collection of the ransom while keeping the Extortionists insulated and safe. I don't know how anyone could read the FACTS in V2 and come away with a different conclusion UNLESS they excuse what he did by saying he was in fear for his life or was being blackmailed into his role. He certainly knew quite a bit more than what he was lying to police about. One could argue he knew nothing about the kidnapping but I personally believe at some point before the ransom was paid that he knew the child was dead. But when it comes to him being guilty of assisting the criminals with the extortion there is no question whatsoever and I am convinced that extra 20K was originally meant for him. Where did you get the idea that 20K was originally meant for Condon?
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Jul 6, 2019 5:58:22 GMT -5
Where did you get the idea that 20K was originally meant for Condon? Honestly Luf its a conclusion drawn based upon all the information in V2. Too often people hunt for Easter Eggs hoping to find a specific number on the bottom. It's kind of why I've been forced to write these volumes. Once you step back and look at everything the bigger picture starts to emerge. From Cops like Walsh and Keaten believing he was involved, to Lindbergh and Breckinridge saying (behind the scenes only) that he was suspicious, the bait & switch with the ransom delivery, to all of the lies which seemed designed for a purpose and/or because he forgot his previous lie. It's not like he told just one or two - right? So trying to find that one lie clouds the fact there were 50, 60 or more. However, if you want one place to hang your hat I've always said I agree with Inspector Walsh when he flatly accused Condon of this. ( See V2 pages 236-37). But do not stop there! It is supported by ALL of the other information I've included throughout.
|
|