truthseeker777
Recruit
Trying again after almost three years. Can someone guide me?
Posts: 8
|
Post by truthseeker777 on Jul 16, 2020 21:01:14 GMT -5
Yes. I believe the body was that of a child who had died at St.Michael's and was procured by/or for a pathologist friend of Lindbergh, to be evidence for the staged kidnapping set up by Lindbergh himself to cover for his child being taken and secretly dropped off at an institution for the "feeble-minded"located in the boondocks of Georgetown Delaware. During that time people were known to simply drop off their child, no questions asked because times were tough. The child didn't even need to be mentally challenged, just not wanted. I believe the child was taken by boat to Cape Henlopen from New Jersey and was transported the short trip to the facility in Georgetown. I'm not sure of the original name, but at some point the place was named "Home for the Feeble-minded" then "Delaware Colony", then "Stockley Center." It is a state facility now. Lindbergh involved some of the staff in his plan for March 1, 1932 and swore them to secrecy so as not to let Anne know. Things got complicated and it's too much for me to share on this one post, but I have a very plausible theory as well as something I was told by my aunt who worked at Stockley Center for many years. Pieces of the puzzle remain blank but there is much to ponder considering the lying, controlling and deceptive nature we have discovered about Charles Lindbergh.
|
|
truthseeker777
Recruit
Trying again after almost three years. Can someone guide me?
Posts: 8
|
Post by truthseeker777 on Feb 23, 2019 16:38:27 GMT -5
And by whom were the positive points of identification made? If Lindbergh could control the police dept. and the entire trial, could he not have also controlled the rest?
|
|
truthseeker777
Recruit
Trying again after almost three years. Can someone guide me?
Posts: 8
|
Post by truthseeker777 on Feb 22, 2019 21:56:11 GMT -5
Of course it is logical that others at Stockley had to have known the true identity of Charlie. I also tend to think the secret was so well kept out of fear because of the power of the Lindbergh family. My aunt was regretful (perhaps also fearful) that she had told me what she did and as I have posted, refused to talk about it any further. Incidentally, at the time she told me she had recently retired after several decades of service at Stockley.,
|
|
truthseeker777
Recruit
Trying again after almost three years. Can someone guide me?
Posts: 8
|
Post by truthseeker777 on Feb 18, 2019 19:31:08 GMT -5
Believe me I have tried to solicit help to investigate Stockley's records, even to contacting Anna Hauptmann's lawyer Robert Bryan, many years ago. I told him my story over the phone and he even said it very well could be true, but I needed to bring him more evidence-----THAT"S what I needed HIM for!! He said he was busy in California, ironically involved with a capital punishment case. Remember this was before the internet. I contacted Mike Holfeld a reporter on WKMG in Florida who was examining and discussing evidence regarding the Lindbergh case. I invited him to Delaware to see if he could obtain any records from Stockley. He didn't think the chances were good enough. I have been in touch with JT Townsend a famous crime investigative author who has written much about the case. He seems to think it's "too cold" and is busy with many other book projects he has going. Oh yes, I have prayed about this and racked my brain for decades now, to no avail. My aunt did not work at Stockley until the fifties. She would have known Charlie as a young adult. My guess is he has probably died by now wherever he was. Had I gotten a source of help in the nineties there may have been a better chance of uncovering something. I have talked with other of my family members about my aunt and no one was ever told what she told me, my husband, my now deceased step-mother, and deceased step-father when we ere playing the game that night.
|
|
truthseeker777
Recruit
Trying again after almost three years. Can someone guide me?
Posts: 8
|
Post by truthseeker777 on Feb 16, 2019 22:45:26 GMT -5
She either killed herself out of guilt for the secret (kept from Anne Lindbergh) about the baby's "alleged" kidnapping or she was forced into suicide by Charles.
|
|
truthseeker777
Recruit
Trying again after almost three years. Can someone guide me?
Posts: 8
|
Post by truthseeker777 on Feb 16, 2019 21:51:26 GMT -5
ONE MORE THING. I BELIEVE IT WAS ON THE DAY THE BODY WAS FOUND, MAYBE NOT, BUT WASN'T CHARLES OUT ON A BOAT HIMSELF SUPPOSEDLY LOOKING FOR HIS SON WHO WAS RUMORED TO HAVE BEEN TAKEN ON A BOAT?
|
|
truthseeker777
Recruit
Trying again after almost three years. Can someone guide me?
Posts: 8
|
Post by truthseeker777 on Feb 16, 2019 21:41:50 GMT -5
I believe the child was left anonymously. As I said there was no paper work involved when people just abandoned children there. Other family members of mine who worked there in the 50's and on said many people were not even "mentally challenged" or as it was called "feeble-minded" then "retarded".My aunt told me she knew exactly where Charles Jr. was and could take me to him, but when she told me this back in the 80s I was ignorant of most of the story about the kidnapping. When I questioned her later she was deeply regretful she had told me anything and didn't want to talk about it any further. For a time, working at Stockley, she was involved in placing "functional" "mildly retarded" kids and young adults with people in the area. At that time, as you may know, there were lots of farms in the area and families needing workers. My guess is that is what happened .My aunt even said something about a lady in black coming from time to time. You need to know that this information she shared came as we were playing a game of Trivial Pursuit at our beach place in lower Delaware. A question came up about the name of the person who kidnapped and killed the Lindbergh baby. My aunt blurted out in her country manner "No he never!" I asked no who never what. 'He never killed him. I can take you to him right now and place my hand on him." Sadly out of ignorance, it took me years, until after seeing "The Airman and The Carpenter" movie, to get interested in pursuing more. She refused to discuss it and died in the nineties. I won't make this response any longer by going into all I have done over the years to try to get help with this. I am haunted by the thought that an innocent man was executed for a crime he did not commit.
|
|
truthseeker777
Recruit
Trying again after almost three years. Can someone guide me?
Posts: 8
|
Post by truthseeker777 on Feb 12, 2019 21:10:32 GMT -5
Yes. I believe the body was that of a child who had died at St.Michael's and was procured by/or for a pathologist friend of Lindbergh, to be evidence for the staged kidnapping set up by Lindbergh himself to cover for his child being taken and secretly dropped off at an institution for the "feeble-minded"located in the boondocks of Georgetown Delaware. During that time people were known to simply drop off their child, no questions asked because times were tough. The child didn't even need to be mentally challenged, just not wanted. I believe the child was taken by boat to Cape Henlopen from New Jersey and was transported the short trip to the facility in Georgetown. I'm not sure of the original name, but at some point the place was named "Home for the Feeble-minded" then "Delaware Colony", then "Stockley Center." It is a state facility now. Lindbergh involved some of the staff in his plan for March 1, 1932 and swore them to secrecy so as not to let Anne know. Things got complicated and it's too much for me to share on this one post, but I have a very plausible theory as well as something I was told by my aunt who worked at Stockley Center for many years. Pieces of the puzzle remain blank but there is much to ponder considering the lying, controlling and deceptive nature we have discovered about Charles Lindbergh.
|
|