|
Post by Michael on Feb 8, 2013 11:55:15 GMT -5
You're right Steve - Governor Moore brought him in (along with some others). Isn't it funny how Schwarkopf didn't want him but basically allows him to be the spokesman for the investigation during the May 18th meeting?
But anyway, as you can see by what he was telling Agent Sisk, there was a major falling out (and the feeling was mutual).
|
|
|
Post by wolf2 on Feb 8, 2013 18:54:04 GMT -5
mike, maybe norman didnt have a choice.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2013 20:03:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Jun 16, 2013 19:11:27 GMT -5
Mystery of Lindbergh baby continues The Cycle | January 30, 2013
|
|
|
Post by jldella99 on Jul 4, 2013 3:27:49 GMT -5
One possibility for the blood clot being on the left is because the left was the dependent area, assuming the child remained on his left side for an hour or so after dying and that the source of bleeding were from vessels located in a relatively superficial area, usually the ones found in the epidural or outer subdural spaces. So...child's left side of the head is on the floor (or other hard surfce) as the right side is struck. Because of gravity, and if the bleeding is on an outer surface of the brain, the blood runs downward and pools on the left side.
|
|
|
Post by bookrefuge on Jul 4, 2013 8:02:51 GMT -5
jldella99, I like this thinking. Are you in the medical field? A layman doesn’t typically use phrases like “the epidural or outer subdural spaces.”
|
|
|
Post by johno on Aug 5, 2014 22:11:52 GMT -5
One disappointing thing about the documentary is that it appealed to the picture of Knolls thumbs, one in which the palms were not visible. Condon, who mentioned the thumbs said the defect was in the muscle in the palm. Consistent with this he asked people in the lineup to hold their hands palm out wards facing him.
if that is right then the photo of the odd thumb fingers is not probative.
|
|
|
Post by johno on Aug 8, 2014 12:53:40 GMT -5
Looking up Condon,s remark on the odd thumb of CJ, he refers to it, in his pompous way, as located at "the thenar eminence". Since that is in the palm of the hand, one of Zorn's best pieces of evidence, the photo of the outside of Knoll,s hand, is severely damaged.
Also to me the Perone sketch looks as much like Hauptmann as Knoll.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2014 15:04:10 GMT -5
I agree on the fleshy lump. If it was a factual thing and not something Condon conjured up as a way to never have to make a positive ID of anyone, Knoll's thumb abnormality means he is not CJ. Also the use of Bruno. Absolutely no one called Hauptmann Bruno! I respect Zorn's book as a way for him to finish what his father believed to be true. I do not use it as a source book for research, however.
What Perrone sketch are you referring to?
|
|
|
Post by johno on Aug 8, 2014 15:56:31 GMT -5
Cahill has the sketch on pg 87 where he says it is taken from Condon,s description of CJ and from witnesses who saw a man passing the kidnap money.
i had remembered or misremembered that perrone had input into that sketch as well.
In any case, the sketch if validly obtained, supports Condon's identification of Hauptmann as CJ.
Was it validly obtained and wen?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2014 18:36:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by johno on Aug 9, 2014 18:49:23 GMT -5
Thanks, very helpful. The thinner faced man in the earlier sketch looks very unlike Knoll.
|
|