|
Post by Laurence24 on Apr 29, 2020 5:48:43 GMT -5
De mon côté, j'ai pensée à 3 personnes sur place. Un conduisait la voiture,et faisait le guet. Deux étaient dehors, un pour tenir l'échelle pendant que le 3 ième montait..mais même ,comment un homme peut il monter et redescendre avec un enfant ?..
J'ai également lu que l'enfant était en décomposition avancée lorsque celui çi a été retrouvé. Si le corps était bien en décomposition avancée,comme mentionné,dans ce cas,j'ai recherchée aussi de ce côté çi, ça colle pas avec la date de l'enlèvement de l'enfant,qui aurait pu être décédé bien antérieurement..aux faits. Avez vous cherchés les dates ou l'enfant a été vu ou photographié avant l'enlevement ?
Et je soupçonne Isidor Fisch d'avoir participé à l'enlèvement,car rappellont au passage,( dites moi si je me trompe) que c'est lui qui a remis une boite à chaussures à Bruno Haptmann ..Lorsque celui çi l'a ouvert, il y trouva des " certificats or" ..ces même certificats or qui auraient servit à la rançon.. Qu'en pensez vous?
|
|
|
Post by Laurence24 on Apr 29, 2020 6:56:42 GMT -5
En regardant la vidéo,un chose m'interpelle..( au passage je comprend pas l'anglais) mais regardez l 'expression des visages.. Avez vous remarqués à 1 minute 46 de la vidéo,l'on voit le couple Lindbergh,Charles a un visage clair....Anne elle sourit à la caméra..
Comment une mère dont l'enfant a été enlevé peut elle sourire à la caméra ? Comment un père dont l'enfant a été enlevé avoir un visage clair,le sourire est présent!! Certes ,l'on va me dire que c'est le soleil la cause..ça pourrait être effectivement être le cas.. L'une est prononcé ( Anne),l'autre fermé ( Charles ) ,mais c'est flagrant!! du moins pour moi!! et ça me choque ce genre de comportement !! Celà cacherait il quelque chose que vous auriez pas abordés? C'est juste une remarque.;au passage!! et vous qu'en pensez vous?
|
|
|
Post by Laurence24 on Apr 29, 2020 7:08:39 GMT -5
En repassant la vidéo à partir de 1 minute 46.. Regardez attentivement,ça passe vite Entre 1 minute 46 et 47, Charles change en peu de temps,son sourire et fait mine de ruminer quelque chose,ça se voit au niveau de ses lèvres..
Le couple semble être fière de passer à la caméra ( Une façon pour eux d'être vue du monde) comme important.. Regardez dans ce lapse temps ,la morphologie du visage du couple,et dites moi ce que vous percevez de votre côté?
|
|
|
Post by Laurence24 on Apr 29, 2020 7:43:05 GMT -5
Bonjour,
Pourriez vous s'il vous plaît faire une capture écran sur google map du même cliché avec des repères de lieux par les noms ? Ca me permettrait de me retrouver ,car ne connaissant pas la région comme vous, j ai cherchée sur map,je me doute que je suis pas loin,mais c'est compliqué de trouver l'endroit exact de la la maison du couple..
Merci à vous!!
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Apr 29, 2020 10:28:42 GMT -5
Unfortunately, I know you'll never waiver in your misguided belief. Lindbergh made no trips back to the U.S. between '35 and '37. Have you read Anne Lindbergh's published diaries? She covers the entire two years and would surely have mentioned her husband's absence during that time. And there would be ships' manifests confirming his travels. Why not accept the fact that your mother's father may have been just a good, ordinary guy, or even a scoundrel? He certainly wasn't CAL. I think there are many reasons why someone might have been in a position for a picture like the one referenced. Take Red for example. The guy was in the country illegally and didn't have two nickels to rub together. And yet, there he is walking around Highfields. In short, I recommend all possibilities be considered - especially the most common first.
|
|
|
Post by kristy on Oct 10, 2020 14:49:56 GMT -5
It's mentioned several times that the ladder was left behind. Could leaving the ladder behind have been because carrying both it and the baby became an issue? It's possible the baby was dropped and injured at that time, and the ladder was left behind in order to get to a safe place to check on the babys injury. There's also the sound Anne heard of a baby crying after they realised Charlie was missing. (could that have been Charlie crying out when he was injured)?
|
|
|
Post by aaron on Oct 10, 2020 16:17:58 GMT -5
The ladder may have been made for the one specific instance. it was made for the most part of various pieces of wood probably left over from earlier jobs, not weathered or worn. The one exception was "Rail 16" which was a last minute grab since the ladder had to be finished quickly. The sound Anne heard was not that of a baby crying, according to Elsie Whatley but a cat meowing, as cats do in early spring--their mating season.
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Oct 11, 2020 6:27:08 GMT -5
It's mentioned several times that the ladder was left behind. Could leaving the ladder behind have been because carrying both it and the baby became an issue? It's possible the baby was dropped and injured at that time, and the ladder was left behind in order to get to a safe place to check on the babys injury. There's also the sound Anne heard of a baby crying after they realised Charlie was missing. (could that have been Charlie crying out when he was injured)? That's one theory. I've always questioned it since they chose to move the ladder in the first place. Moving that ladder is also something that's made me question the "flight from freight" explanation as well.
|
|
Joe
Lt. Colonel
Posts: 2,614
|
Post by Joe on Oct 11, 2020 10:36:34 GMT -5
It's mentioned several times that the ladder was left behind. Could leaving the ladder behind have been because carrying both it and the baby became an issue? It's possible the baby was dropped and injured at that time, and the ladder was left behind in order to get to a safe place to check on the babys injury. There's also the sound Anne heard of a baby crying after they realised Charlie was missing. (could that have been Charlie crying out when he was injured)? That's one theory. I've always questioned it since they chose to move the ladder in the first place. Moving that ladder is also something that's made me question the "flight from freight" explanation as well. I've always considered the primary possibility they originally had no intention of leaving the ladder behind and that their first reaction was to grab any potential evidence when the ladder rail split unexpectedly, but that it just became too much of an encumbrance as they retreated.
|
|