kevkon
Lt. Colonel
Posts: 2,800
|
Post by kevkon on Jan 1, 2008 7:21:11 GMT -5
Exactly Giszmo. And I am sure that this wasting of time is well appreciated by the instigator.
I do have a major problem however, with your use of the phrase "rambling nut on another website". This is totally unacceptable as there are multiple rambling nuts and you should be more specific when referring to them. Give credit where credit is due!
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Jan 6, 2008 9:05:18 GMT -5
Gotcha Gismo. It's all speculation based upon something we've never seen so we should probably wait....
For anyone curious - Bornmann returned the keys to Max Rauch on March 1, 1935.
|
|
kevkon
Lt. Colonel
Posts: 2,800
|
Post by kevkon on Jan 6, 2008 10:46:14 GMT -5
I have a very difficult time believing that anyone who is serious about this case and especially someone who has devoted so much time and effort would be wasting their time on that other site. I mean what is going on there anyway? It's great comedic entertainment , I'll grant you that, but what is the point of it all? Just when I think that it has arrived at rock bottom stupid, it surprises me and sinks lower. Kinda reminds me of Brittney Spears. And I really cringe when I think of younger people who may have an interest in this case who see the immature nonsense going on there which includes( but is not limited to) senility, dementia, ego, and grand delusions If you have serious information and evidence is this how to present it?
|
|
mairi
Lieutenant
Posts: 548
|
Post by mairi on Jan 6, 2008 13:36:39 GMT -5
Exalts, Kevkon! I think you are right on.
|
|
kevkon
Lt. Colonel
Posts: 2,800
|
Post by kevkon on Jan 10, 2008 8:01:16 GMT -5
Looks like I may owe Brittney an apology, her actions actually seem more rational than those occurring on the "hoax" site. Hey, at least she still knows who she is!!
|
|
jack7
Major
Der Führer
Posts: 1,920
|
Post by jack7 on May 1, 2008 0:05:57 GMT -5
This to my knowledge has only been posted once before, and it was posted by the true Jack The Ripper in 1886, and not solved until about 1990. Unusual - moreso! I've studied Ripper for many years and in fact solved it and this tie in is beyond belief! One thing I can tell you though is that Dave is/was not Jack The Rpper. But I think he knows who was. Actually I'm not sure even of that - Dave may well be JTR!
|
|