|
Post by Sue on Jul 30, 2020 21:04:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Aug 1, 2020 11:05:11 GMT -5
Thanks for posting this Sue. I've been looking forward to this book! Looks like it will be available to purchase in September.
Regent Press Link
Lise Pearlman Website
|
|
|
Post by hurtelable on Aug 1, 2020 12:33:24 GMT -5
Reading through all these publicity blurbs for the new book, it seems as it the author is coming from a contemporary left-wing political perspective.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2020 9:57:37 GMT -5
Well, I am excited to read this book when it comes out. I want to know what dusty archives she is talking about that yielded crucial forensic evidence never before analyzed. I am also glad to see someone put Lindbergh in that ladder car the night of March 1, 1932. It is certainly something I have considered a good possibility. Lindbergh's whereabouts the day and evening of March 1, 1932 have never been adequately explained and he was seen in the area of his home before the time he claims he officially arrived there. I look forward to what this author has to share in this book.
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Aug 3, 2020 9:27:49 GMT -5
Reading through all these publicity blurbs for the new book, it seems as it the author is coming from a contemporary left-wing political perspective. You have to divorce yourself from the "political" climate of today when evaluating anything from the past. So I recommend simply asking yourself whether its true or isn't. What did Lindbergh believe? Just read his Reader's Digest article " Aviation, Geography, and Race." Also, consider that during Ellis Parker's career he actually stopped a mob from lynching a man - and this was in NJ and not the deep south.
|
|
|
Post by forensics fan on Aug 17, 2020 16:17:46 GMT -5
Hi lindbergh message board, I just wanted to let you know that The Lindbergh Kidnapping Suspect No.1 is available to pre-order now on www.lisepearlman.com for those who are interested. It also has more details about what all is included in the book, including pictures of what Charlie looked liked at the time he disappeared.
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Aug 19, 2020 11:21:51 GMT -5
Hi lindbergh message board, I just wanted to let you know that The Lindbergh Kidnapping Suspect No.1 is available to pre-order now on www.lisepearlman.com for those who are interested. It also has more details about what all is included in the book, including pictures of what Charlie looked liked at the time he disappeared. Thanks for the update. I ordered mine! I ordered the Doherty book as well which is also available to pre-order (Thanks to Sue).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2020 17:03:06 GMT -5
I also ordered this book!! I am so looking forward to reading it!
|
|
|
Post by forensics fan on Aug 20, 2020 13:59:57 GMT -5
Hi Michael and Amy and anyone else who is interested in ordering or who has already ordered: I'm actually one of the researchers for this book and I just wanted to let you know that the kindle version will be available very soon for $14.99 and is expected to be available by the release date of Sept 1. I thought the e-book was available already to pre-order, but it isn't yet. Just FYI in case you would like to cancel your pre - order and get the kindle version instead when it's available to order. The website has been updated to let people know that the e-book will be available to order soon.
|
|
|
Post by wolfman666 on Aug 20, 2020 18:32:36 GMT -5
i think any book saying lindbergh killed his own son is total garbage.i see no evidence at all and this nonsense saying his child was ill makes him a murderer, i bought the book but will tell my take on this so called groundbreaking book
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2020 18:43:23 GMT -5
Hi Michael and Amy and anyone else who is interested in ordering or who has already ordered: I'm actually one of the researchers for this book and I just wanted to let you know that the kindle version will be available very soon for $14.99 and is expected to be available by the release date of Sept 1. I thought the e-book was available already to pre-order, but it isn't yet. Just FYI in case you would like to cancel your pre - order and get the kindle version instead when it's available to order. The website has been updated to let people know that the e-book will be available to order soon. Thanks, forensics fan for letting me know about the kindle version. I will definitely be interested in the kindle book but will keep my hard copy order in place. I own Michael's books in both formats. I am really excited to see what you and the others who have worked on this book have to share about this fascinating case. I was impressed with the endorsements Judge Pearlman received for her work on this book.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2020 18:45:07 GMT -5
i think any book saying lindbergh killed his own son is total garbage.i see no evidence at all and this nonsense saying his child was ill makes him a murderer, i bought the book but will tell my take on this so called groundbreaking book I am really happy that you are willing to read this book, Steve. I look forward to reading your thoughts on the book.
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Aug 20, 2020 18:55:33 GMT -5
FF: I prefer a hard copy. I have every book on the case, to include unpublished manuscripts (as anyone who has read my books can see) with the exception of Zorn and Dedman. I could eventually get those too if I find them in the recycle bin we have in our community near the trash compactor.
Steve: Keaten and Walsh both blamed Lindbergh. Whateley confesses an insider was involved. And Whited saw Lindbergh come home early on March 1st. All in my books, and it’s only the tip of the iceberg. Don’t you rely on all of these people when believing the historical narrative? If so, why haven’t you adjusted to these facts?
|
|
|
Post by Sue on Aug 20, 2020 19:39:02 GMT -5
What is Forensic Fan's real name?
How much of the book did FF research?
How much did Lise Pearlman contribute?
Were there other researchers besides these two?
Just wondering.
|
|
|
Post by wolfman666 on Aug 20, 2020 19:46:09 GMT -5
what facts mike? why you people ignore the evidence against hauptman and say lindberghdid it with no real evidence is mined boggling. if lindbergh was involved he must have known hauptman because thats where it points to
|
|
|
Post by forensics fan on Aug 20, 2020 20:57:18 GMT -5
Hi Sue:
I'm Judge Pearlman's daughter and her lead research assistant. There were a few other research assistants but my mother is the principal researcher and the theories and writing are her own. It was necessary to use a few research assistants because several of the archives were not easily or economically accessible. Though she did fly/drive hundreds of miles to visit many of them. Of the 20+ brick and mortar archival collections utilized, my mother personally conducted the research at the vast majority, including the NJSPM. For the ones we didn't get to directly and whose collections weren't digitized, researchers were hired to take photos of the documents we were interested in so we could analyze them.
|
|
|
Post by Sue on Aug 20, 2020 22:07:23 GMT -5
Hello to Judge Pearlman's daughter --
I applaud all the hard work and time (and miles!) that you and your mother put into reinvestigating the Lindbergh case!
I am very much looking forward to reading this account from a women's perspective!
|
|
|
Post by forensics fan on Aug 20, 2020 22:34:44 GMT -5
Sue --
Thank you! We're excited for you to read it, too!
|
|
|
Post by forensics fan on Aug 20, 2020 22:54:46 GMT -5
Sue -- If you would like to get an idea of my mom's writing style and analysis of case history in the context of the times in which they occurred, her award winning history books are currently available to order on www.lisepearlman.com and Amazon.com "With Justice For Some" and "The Sky's the Limit" both offer her prior analysis of different historical cases, including snapshots of the Lindbergh case, just not in nearly the amount of detail that is covered in Suspect No. 1.
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Aug 20, 2020 23:41:25 GMT -5
what facts mike? why you people ignore the evidence against hauptman and say lindberghdid it with no real evidence is mined boggling. if lindbergh was involved he must have known hauptman because thats where it points to Wolfman, I like your conclusion! I've often thought so myself: that CAL knew BRH -- and vice versa.
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Aug 21, 2020 0:39:04 GMT -5
what facts mike? why you people ignore the evidence against hauptman and say lindberghdid it with no real evidence is mined boggling. if lindbergh was involved he must have known hauptman because thats where it points to Actually, you are doing quite a bit of ignoring yourself. Kind of like concluding it was a one-man job despite Lindbergh claiming there was a lookout. So you believe him except where it doesn’t fit into your theory. And why would anyone have to know anyone else? So did Perrone know the Kidnappers? Did Lindbergh know Condon prior to his involvement in the extortion? By your argument, if I hire a contractor to build my house I’m suppose to personally know the Plumber, the Carpenter, and the Guatemalan day laborers.
|
|
|
Post by forensics fan on Aug 21, 2020 1:50:20 GMT -5
FF: I prefer a hard copy. I have every book on the case, to include unpublished manuscripts (as anyone who has read my books can see) with the exception of Zorn and Dedman. I could eventually get those too if I find them in the recycle bin we have in our community near the trash compactor. Steve: Keaten and Walsh both blamed Lindbergh. Whateley confesses an insider was involved. And Whited saw Lindbergh come home early on March 1st. All in my books, and it’s only the tip of the iceberg. Don’t you rely on all of these people when believing the historical narrative? If so, why haven’t you adjusted to these facts? Michael -- Thanks. I just wanted to let people know that there will be an e-book version in case money or speed of delivery is an issue. I don't think the physical copies will ship until Sept 1. I prefer physical copies myself. I find them much more satisfying to read.
|
|
|
Post by wolfman666 on Aug 21, 2020 7:22:22 GMT -5
it wont be good because i never believed lindbergh killed his own son. i have cds of a radio debate with moinier and fisher.
|
|
Joe
Lt. Colonel
Posts: 2,640
|
Post by Joe on Aug 21, 2020 7:33:04 GMT -5
what facts mike? why you people ignore the evidence against hauptman and say lindberghdid it with no real evidence is mined boggling. if lindbergh was involved he must have known hauptman because thats where it points to Actually, you are doing quite a bit of ignoring yourself. Kind of like concluding it was a one-man job despite Lindbergh claiming there was a lookout. So you believe him except where it doesn’t fit into your theory. And why would anyone have to know anyone else? So did Perrone know the Kidnappers? Did Lindbergh know Condon prior to his involvement in the extortion? By your argument, if I hire a contractor to build my house I’m suppose to personally know the Plumber, the Carpenter, and the Guatemalan day laborers. Michael, your Guatemalan connection analogy has always been weak and irrelevant, because it completely overlooks how much attention and energy would have been paid to investigate the people and details in a house building vs. a murder. Sure, you might never know the guy who installed your windows under normal and mundane circumstances, but if he dropped one of those windows on a co-worker's head, I'm sure that name would be known publicly through the police investigation. They'd also want to know if the accused had some kind of motive to do what he did, and just how you might have fit into the overall scheme. There are a veritable sea of dots in this case to preferentially choose the ones that each individual likes the best. If there was a connection between Hauptmann and Lindbergh, not to mention the countless high profile individuals who would have had to have been involved in a Lindy Did It scenario, it would have come to clear light by now. I know you like both Walsh and Keaten, but both had huge and debilitating egos and neither one would have wanted to have been proven wrong.
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Aug 21, 2020 8:03:40 GMT -5
Michael, your Guatemalan connection analogy has always been weak and irrelevant, because it completely overlooks how much attention and energy would have been paid to investigate the people and details in a house building vs. a murder. Sure, you might never know the guy who installed your windows under normal and mundane circumstances, but if he dropped one of those windows on a co-worker's head, I'm sure that name would be known publicly through the police investigation. They'd also want to know if the accused had some kind of motive to do what he did, and just how you might have fit into the overall scheme. There are a veritable sea of dots in this case to preferentially choose the ones that each individual likes the best. If there was a connection between Hauptmann and Lindbergh, not to mention the countless high profile individuals who would have had to have been involved in a Lindy Did It scenario, it would have come to clear light by now. I know you like both Walsh and Keaten, but both had huge and debilitating egos and neither one would have wanted to have been proven wrong. I think you are missing the point Joe. Just simply refer to those who worked on Lindbergh's house for example. This idea that Lindbergh hired Matthews Construction means he had to know who everyone was on that job is just plain silly. Speaking of which, the police immediately began a detailed investigation into everyone who worked on Highfields. This investigation extended well into the summer of 1934, they still didn't know everyone who worked on that job, and there were people they wanted to interview that were never located. So this example alone disproves each of your positions above. Next, this idea that the most famous man on the planet HAD to have been on City Island hiring Kidnappers himself in order to be the impetus defies common sense. Remember that Lindbergh went toe to toe with J. Edgar Hoover - and won. So not only was Lindbergh powerful, he knew countless other very powerful people. As a small example, look at what Breckinridge was willing to do for the man. Just toting the ransom around could have gotten him disbarred - but he did it anyway. There are many people, right now, in Federal Prisons across our country who have been convicted of participating in a conspiracy with people they did not know and never met. Some have pled guilty and admitted their roles in these conspiracies. If what both you and Steve believe is true - they are all innocent.
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Aug 21, 2020 8:16:56 GMT -5
it wont be good because i never believed lindbergh killed his own son. i have cds of a radio debate with moinier and fisher. Lindbergh was a Eugenicist. Once considering he may have believed there was something "defective" about his son, its in no way "crazy" to think it at least crossed his mind. So this emotional response concerning someone who not only believed but acted the role doesn't make any sense to me. It doesn't make him guilty of course, but its the irrational push back I see against the "idea" or "possibility" that is puzzling to me.
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Aug 21, 2020 8:38:14 GMT -5
Michael -- Thanks. I just wanted to let people know that there will be an e-book version in case money or speed of delivery is an issue. I don't think the physical copies will ship until Sept 1. I prefer physical copies myself. I find them much more satisfying to read. Got it. Obviously my situation is a little different than most everyone else. I'm just finishing up a chapter in V4 now, and can't stop to read until its complete. This is one place where I cannot walk and chew gum at the same time which I'm sure you can appreciate having researched yourself through all of this material. That makes the timing perfect for me regardless. Once I get your book and this chapter is complete, I will shut down the my whole project and read. It will be just my luck that the "new" information I've recorded in places may be contained in the Judge's book ... so who knows right? For example, I have a new source for the Whatetely confession but if its in this book, I may have to adjust - or scrap it altogether. Same with my "outline." My next chapter was going to be about a very complex figure and its going to be very difficult. But if your mother has already successfully tackled the subject, she may have saved me a lot of time - so its good it will be out before I continue. Anyway, I am quite sure you've found sources that I've never seen and have perspectives I may have never considered. Needless to say, I am looking forward to reading and learning from it all!
|
|
|
Post by wolfman666 on Aug 21, 2020 8:53:05 GMT -5
i wont debate lindbergh did it i think its total garbage
|
|
|
Post by forensics fan on Aug 21, 2020 10:08:23 GMT -5
Amy and Wolfman:
I'm so sorry I missed your replies before. I just saw them. Thank you both so much and everyone else who ordered the book. Very eager to know what you think after you've finished reading it.
Wolfman: I really appreciate you giving it a chance. Thank you. I would appreciate a very honest review when you finish. Don't hold anything back. I know my mother feels exactly the same way.
Amy: We are very excited about the endorsements, too. I think one of the reasons they found the argument so compelling is because of all the photographic content and copies of original documents they could see for themselves.
|
|
|
Post by forensics fan on Aug 21, 2020 10:25:50 GMT -5
Michael --
I totally understand where you're coming from about minimizing distraction. I can't wait for your thoughts on this book, as someone who has conducted so much of the grunt work researching this case and is one of the top recognized experts, your honest opinion will carry a lot of weight for me personally, and I'm pretty confident my mother, too. Good luck on Volume 4! Excited to read it when it comes out!
|
|