|
Post by rmc1971 on Jul 26, 2019 14:14:21 GMT -5
Hi. Have a quick question about the interlocking circles on the notes. The latin for the interlocking circles is vesica piscis - translated to fish bladder. Out of curiosity, has anyone ever used that symbol as a theory that Fisch was behind the note and was giving away a clue to his identity, or that it was used by someone else as a means to implicate Fisch in the kidnapping? Not saying I buy any of that but wondering if anyone ever went down that route before.
|
|
jack7
Major
Der Führer
Posts: 1,920
|
Post by jack7 on Jul 27, 2019 6:11:16 GMT -5
I'm sure the interlocking circles question (did it refer to Fisch?) will be answered along with all other questions in V3. I'm looking towards V8, then all questions will be closer to being answered.
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Jul 27, 2019 7:26:55 GMT -5
Hi. Have a quick question about the interlocking circles on the notes. The latin for the interlocking circles is vesica piscis - translated to fish bladder. Out of curiosity, has anyone ever used that symbol as a theory that Fisch was behind the note and was giving away a clue to his identity, or that it was used by someone else as a means to implicate Fisch in the kidnapping? Not saying I buy any of that but wondering if anyone ever went down that route before. It's mentioned in the files in a couple of places. One that comes to mind in a letter to Hoffman. If you are pursuing this angle let me know and I'll see if I can find it for you. I'm sure the interlocking circles question (did it refer to Fisch?) will be answered along with all other questions in V3. I'm looking towards V8, then all questions will be closer to being answered. V4, if there is one, will be my last. I do understand there are people who would rather not learn what's really in the files. It blows up their fantasies and causes people to reconsider what actually happened. For some that can be difficult.
|
|
Joe
Lt. Colonel
Posts: 2,640
|
Post by Joe on Jul 27, 2019 12:28:16 GMT -5
Hi. Have a quick question about the interlocking circles on the notes. The latin for the interlocking circles is vesica piscis - translated to fish bladder. Out of curiosity, has anyone ever used that symbol as a theory that Fisch was behind the note and was giving away a clue to his identity, or that it was used by someone else as a means to implicate Fisch in the kidnapping? Not saying I buy any of that but wondering if anyone ever went down that route before. Rab (Robert Purdy) explored the vesica piscis angle and I recall having a couple of phone conversations relative to the meaning of the ransom note symbols in the early 2000's. Personally, I believe any reference to Fisch is a couple of levels removed by coincidence from the actual intent and origin of the symbol. I believe there may also be a thread or two under that name here.
|
|
geld
Trooper
Posts: 43
|
Post by geld on Aug 1, 2019 19:54:36 GMT -5
Mike,don't quit! We need you . I have the letter about the interlocking circles from GERMANDY dated June 18, 1936. If I can figure out how to post it I will! Also. I think the the backside of the Playing Card are the answer.
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Aug 2, 2019 10:36:16 GMT -5
Mike,don't quit! We need you . I have the letter about the interlocking circles from GERMANDY dated June 18, 1936. If I can figure out how to post it I will! Also. I think the the backside of the Playing Card are the answer. I'm not going anywhere. Well, unless I get hit by a car or something. Glad to see your interest in the symbol ... that card Lee posted is interesting for sure. Thanks for trying to share the letter too. Who sent it?
|
|
geld
Trooper
Posts: 43
|
Post by geld on Aug 2, 2019 18:31:37 GMT -5
Letter was sent by a man in GERMANY Mr. RUDOLPH THIELEN, got my copy off your blog.
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Aug 3, 2019 7:34:48 GMT -5
Letter was sent by a man in GERMANY Mr. RUDOLPH THIELEN, got my copy off your blog. Right - he actually went to Germany. He's an interesting guy who entered the case as a Defense Handwriting Expert. Before I started my research all I had to refer to him was the BS that he "refused" to testify because he "believed" Hauptmann wrote the notes. What you have is evidence that he was trying to assist with his defense after the trial was over. And he was a helpful piece because he was a German and many trusted him. Bill Lewis took him on a couple of his investigation as a translator as well as someone he believed would help get people within the German communities to talk.
|
|