|
Post by stella7 on Apr 2, 2019 11:11:31 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2019 13:55:03 GMT -5
This is so interesting! I guess LE was not able to link the students to the crime with any evidence. I wonder if there is any evidence stored that might have DNA that could possibly be retrieved in this case. Looking at the LKC investigation reports from March 1932, Major Schoeffel asked Det. Dunn, Jersey City Police and NJSP Sgt. Haussling to check with Princeton University to see if there might be any "eccentric" students who might be capable of performing the Lindbergh kidnapping. Proctor Hogarty of the University was unable to give any definite information but that there were a few "odd" students that semester but he didn't think they were capable of doing such a kidnapping. Hogarty did offer to conduct a quiet investigation and should he find anything of value, he would report it immediately. I have not yet found any follow-up to this report.
|
|
|
Post by stella7 on Apr 2, 2019 16:29:07 GMT -5
The way this is written makes me think that they were legacy kids who were townies because they were "familiar" with the house.
For years, though, police and prosecutors have never said publicly what NJ Advance Media has learned from law enforcement sources: investigators have long had two suspects in the crime.
And they were Princeton University students at the time, two male teens who were familiar with the home.
|
|